Connect with us

law

IPAC says Appeal Court judgement on deregistered parties is triumph of democracy over tyranny

Published

on

Spread the love

IPAC says Appeal Court judgement on deregistered parties is triumph of democracy over tyranny

The president of the Inter Party Advisory Council Petter Ameh has indicated that attempt by INEC to appeal the recent Appeal Court Judgement which reversed INEC decision to deregister 74 political parties will amount to mere grandstanding and a waste of tax payers money.
This was contained in a press statement that he personally signed and made availlable to newsmen in Abuja yesterday.
According to him, the time tested democratic principles and the rule of law first enunciated by the wise men of ancient Greece and nurtured by the larger democracies world over, including Nigeria, cannot be allowed to crumble in one fell swoop by any agency of government.
He observed that the Appellate Courts have in a plethora of cases including Musa V. INEC continued to stand in defense of liberty, justice, freedom and multi-party democracy as the only route for the advancement of our Nation.
“The Court of Appeal, led by its President Hon. Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, has maintained this noble tradition in the judgment delivered on the 10th August, 2020 by ordering INEC to relist the Appellants who were illegally deregistered.”
He indicated that the conduct of INEC in the saga is indefensible. He recalled that while the Appellants were in Court and in anticipation of the ruling of the Federal High Court fixed for the 17th February, 2020, INEC on 6th February, 2020 went ahead to deregister the Appellants to foist a fait acompli on the Court.

This he said, shows disrespect not only to the political parties but to the Judicial Arm of Government.

“The Court of Appeal has risen in defense of the integrity of the judiciary. A Court must defend its jurisdiction and integrity jealously and courageously and we salute our Judiciary for acting without fear or favour.

“Mistakes have been made by INEC and the trial Court. But to err is human. INEC only need to put this behind it and relist the parties immediately.”
He said, any claim of conflict between the NUP case and the instant one (by any Lawyer), is mischievous and dishonest.
He added that, the Court has not said INEC did not have power to deregister, it only said that the due process of law was not adhered to with respect to the ACD & 21 ORS’ case.
He pointed out that the deregistration of Political Parties is akin to Capital Punishment (death sentence) on natural persons which cannot be allowed without giving fair hearing to the accused.
“Even the all-knowing and all seeing Almighty God having known that Adam ate the forbidden fruit, still gave him the opportunity to say something in his defense before passing judgment.
“The high point of the judgment is the pronouncement by the Court on Section 40 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 on Freedom of Association.
“Even though the proviso to this Section says it shall not derogate from the powers conferred by the Constitution on INEC with respect to Political Parties to which INEC does not accord recognition, the Court put it clearly that this proviso is ousted with respect to Political Parties which INEC has already recognized and registered. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

law

NAPTIP to establish West Africa regional training academy in Nasarawa

Published

on

By

Spread the love

NAPTIP to establish West Africa regional training academy in Nasarawa

From Daniel Abel, Lafia

The Director General of the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP), said it will establish a regional training academy for the entire West Africa in Nasarawa State.

Thr DG of NAPTIP, Hajiya Imaan Sulaiman-Ibrahim, made this known when she led her team on a courtesy call at the Lafia Government House yesterday.

Hajiya Suleiman commended governor, Abdullahi Sule for supporting the agency to carry out its mandate and for accepting the agency establish its regional training academy in the state.

Mrs, Suleiman explained that she was in the state to seek for collaboration with the government to stem the twin evil of human trafficking and irregular migration in the state and across the country.

She appealed to the state governments to setup task forces under the supervision of the state governors to consolidate the efforts of the agency.

According to her NAPTIP is setting up three state task forces in Nasarawa, Benue and Plateau within the week to aggressively checkmate activities of trafficking in the region.

Responding, Governor, Abdullahi Sule, expressed gladness for the selecting the state as location for its regional training academy, stressing that the state deserves to host such facility mostly because of her proximity to the federal capital.

While assuring NAPTIP of the continued support of his administration, Mr. Sule said that the government is already looking for a site to commence the project in Karu Local Government Council.

The Governor assured that once the land is made available, government will immediately fence it for the agency.

Speaking on the mandate of the agency, Engineer Sule promised to reach out to his colleague Governors, to understand the importance of the protection of children, women and protection against rape.

Engineer Sule informed the delegation from the agency that already, the state has in place death penalty for rape cases to serve as deterrent to would-be rapists, even as he restated the commitment of his administration to fighting the evil.

“In Nasarawa State, we already signed the anti-rape law last year and we have already started working on that. We have also signed both the child’s protection and violence against women laws,” he stated.

The Governor was emphatic that with such laws in place, the state government is ready to work with NAPTIP.

Inaugurating the state taskforce on human trafficking, Sule expressed confidence that the committee will be prompt in carrying its responsibilities.

The taskforce comprises of the state Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice as Chairman, while the Zonal Commandant of NAPTIP will serve as Co-Chairman.

Continue Reading

law

Senator Bamidele denies taking any loan From Oceanic, Sterling Banks

Published

on

By

Spread the love

Senator Bamidele denies taking any loan From Oceanic, Sterling Banks

Senator Michael Opeyemi Bamidele, who is the Chairman Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, has denied taking any loan from either defunct Oceanic Bank or Sterling Bank as being insinuated in a section of the media.

The senator who represents Ekiti Central on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) made the clarification on Thursday in a statement issued by his media office.

Bamidele said the matter is currently pending before a court of competent jurisdiction as he described the media report “as contemptuous of the court”.

He maintained that the whole development was “sponsored, politically motivated and maliciously aimed at maligning my image”

He disclosed that he had joined Asset Management Company of Nigeria (AMCON) in the pending suit, in his bid to prove that the banks are the ones owing him instead.

“To set the record straight, Sen. Michael Opeyemi Bamidele (M. O.B.) never borrowed money or took any conventional loan from either Oceanic Bank, Sterling Bank or any Bank whatsoever which has become a subject of court litigation as insinuated.

“Neither does he have any large fund with Sterling Bank which a court ordered not to be released to him as maliciously reported.

“He maintained two accounts with Sterling Bank with balances of N25,000 and N7,000 each and both accounts have been dormant for over ten years”

“It is important to clarify that the case is in respect of a financial transaction way back since 2007 (thirteen years ago) between Sen. Bamidele and Oceanic Bank, which deceived him and many other innocent investors to invest their monies in shares to be managed by the Bank through its subsidiary company called Oceanic Capital.

“The Bank eventually mismanaged the invested funds as well as customers deposits, which, in fact, led to the collapse of the Bank while the shares equally lost value.

“In fact, it is public knowledge that the management of Oceanic Bank faced prosecution for mismanaging investors’ money.

“Contrary to the attempt by some political gladiators and pseudo online reporters to portray Sen.Bamidele as a debtor, he is proudly joining issues with AMCON in court, through his counter claim, to show that it is Oceanic Bank and its promoters who are owing him money as a good faith investor in the capital market through the mergin facility syndicated by the Bank,” he added.

According to him, the whole scenario is not far-fetched from those masquerading to malign his reputation ahead of the 2022 Ekiti Governorship Election and 2023 Presidential Elections.

End

Continue Reading

law

Autonomy for Judiciary has no alternative – Out-going Kogi CJ

Published

on

By

Spread the love

Autonomy for Judiciary has no alternative – Out-going Kogi CJ

By Friday Idachaba

Out-going Chief Judge of Kogi, Justice Henry Olusiyi has said that there is no alternative to the total independence and autonomy of the Judiciary if the third arm of government must discharge its functions creditably.

Olusiyi disclosed this in his speech at the valedictory court session held in his honour on his retirement as the Chief Judge of the state at the High Court complex on Monday in Lokoja.

The Chief Judge held that the Judiciary had the duty of ensuring that every citizen of the country lived a life of dignity and not deprived of “right to life” guaranteed to him under the Constitution.

“In a country which professes to follow the Rule of Law and the principle of Separation of Powers, there is no alternative to a totally Independent judiciary.

“All the three arms of government: The Legislature, Executive and Judiciary are expected to and must work together for achieving the goals set out in the constitution. There must be harmony between the three arms.

“The doctrine of Separation of Powers as enshrined in our Constitution is to ensure checks and balances among the three arms of government to avoid the abuse of power and the risk of one arm wielding absolute power to the detriment of the other arms.

“The rule of law is the fabric that holds society together. Any breach of the rule of law is a potential danger for the sustenance of law and order in the society. Court orders should be respected and complied with as a matter of course”, he said.

The state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Ibrahim Mohammed (SAN) said the tenure of the Chief Judge, though short, was eventful as he was leaving with his footsteps in the sand.

Mohammed said that during the brief period of six months the Executive Arm of government in the state enjoyed a cordial relationship with the Judiciary under Justice Olusiyi.

Usman O. Sule (SAN), representing the body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN), said, posterity would be kind to Olusiyi as a forthright, fearless and independent minded Judge who delivered his judgements without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.

Sule said the jurist had always ensured and showed that parties who appear before him go home happy with sound result of fair hearing, fair trial and sound judgement.

Mr Sam Owoyomi, chairman, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Lokoja branch, who spoke on behalf of other branches in the state described Olusiyi as a child of destiny who had fulfilled destiny.

He said that the Out-going Chief Judge was honest, bold, courageous, incorruptible, impartial judge of great characters and erudition.

Owoyomi urged the authorities to ensure full autonomy was granted the Judiciary.

Pioneer Chief Judge of the state, Justice Umaru Eri (rtd), the Grand Khadi of the state Sharia Court of Appeal, Justice Abdulkareem Aruwa and Justice Sunday Otu, delivered goodwill messages at the occasion.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Justice Olusiyi retired whose judicial career started in 1980 retired today, January 11 on attainment of the mandatory 65 years of age. (NAN)

FDJ/

Continue Reading

Trending